|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
955
   |
Posted - 2013.08.08 11:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would tone down both the positive and negative effects and maybe add some sort of damage application bonus. E.g. increased optimal range and tracking for turrets and missiles.
More drastically, i would add an extra static to all black hole systems.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
955
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 11:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
It's a troll chitsa... he answered his own question in the same sentence.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Polarized.
958
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 12:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Phoenix Jones wrote:The effect is crap, but changing it will only affect those living in it right now, and most likely in a bad way. Those two to three corps who decided to live there will have to redo everything.
This seems like a pointless venture. Address the issue of what makes a hole valuable, therefore a reason to take it over. Right now if someone gets evicted (or even just threatened), they move ship to a new hole. Wormholes themselves need to be more valuable.
The effect... Eh.
You know what, i agree with you. There is nothing wrong with having a system that some people find "less desirable".
Someone will use blackhole systems when we have enough people in W-space.
Putting work in since 2010. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Awakened.
1411
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 09:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote: Stuff about T2 ships
That's pretty cray cray.
All ccp needs to do to "fix" black hole systems is turn the negative weapons related bonuses to positive (e.g. C6 wormholes give a 50% increase to optimal and falloff).
+1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol
Awakened.
1414
|
Posted - 2014.03.14 13:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Just trying to get out of the box, and I'm not sure how difficult it would be to be able to check [yes] it's a T2, therefore add bonuses. It also seems like an idea that would encourage more to move into the lower class blackholes?
During the Chitsas Wormhole meeting last week, while people were talking about their ideas for wormhole space, i found my self thinking "would CCP actually be willing to do this?" and IMO the answer was often "no". I think your proposal falls into that category. If we want any changes to wormhole space, we need to keep it simple and not too resource intensive.
Let's say they did change it to the way i describes, yes you would still turn like a boat but you would be very fast and would have the damage projection to kite effectively. T2 hull would be king in this type of wormhole anyway as they are naturally faster and more agile than T3 hulls.
Damn i'm good... maybe i should run for CSM 
+1 |
|
|
| |
|